Omni International Hospital Is Once Again Under Fire


Omni International Hospital is once again under fire, with a mother claiming her son was blinded after receiving treatment in the hospital’s incubator.

Juliana Dharmadi, a mother of twins, has reported doctors at the hospital to the Jakarta Police for alleged negligence over the incident.

Prominent lawyer O.C. Kaligis, who is representing libel defendant Prita Mulyasari with defamation charges involving the Tangerang hospital, will also represent Juliana in this case.

Kaligis said he chose to represent Prita and Juliana because medical malpractice cases in Indonesia have been difficult to tackle.

Public outcry against Omni International Hospital erupted in the wake of Prita’s case, with the House of Representatives summoning the directors of the hospital and demanding they withdraw all charges against Prita.

“They *Prita and Juliana* represent many victims of malpractice”, Kaligis said.

Juliana said she gave birth to premature twins at Omni International Hospital in May last year. Her sons developed an eye condition known as retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) which many medical institutions, including one in Australia, claim was due to high levels of oxygen in the incubators. One of the twins now has a detached retina and is blind.

A legal representative from Omni International Hospital said she had not heard about Juliana’s claim against the hospital.

Head of the YPKKI, an NGO focusing on health services and consumers, Marius Widjajarta, said his organization had received 540 malpractice reports from Jan. 1999 to Nov. 2008 but none has reached court.

In Indonesia, the legal system becomes complicated when involving malpractice or medical cases.

The commonly stated, basic definition of medical malpractice is an act or omission by a health care provider which deviates from accepted standards of practice in the medical community and causes injury to the patient.

Despite the presence of the 2004 Medical Practice Law and 1992 Health Law, which define medical malpractice, there is no single, concise definition. When a case makes it to court, it usually is tried as negligence or accidental injury.

Sudaryatmo, from the Indonesia Consumer’s Foundation (YLKI), said patients alleging malpractice involving medical services should report their case to either the Indonesia Disciplinary Council for Doctors (MKDDI) or the Council of Doctor’s Ethics under the Indonesian Doctors’ Association (IDI) to lodge a civil law suit or report the doctor to the police for criminal offenses.

Health expert Handrawan Nadesul said the problem with health care in Indonesia was that it had transformed into a medical industrial complex, a term referring to a health industry composed of enterprises including doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, drug manufacturers and banks, among others.

“Health care should be a non-profit venture. When profits are sought, the focus shifts away from service onto money,” he said.(jakartapost)

Popularity: 14% [?]

Most Popular Posts

This entry was posted on Friday, June 12th, 2009 and is filed under Opinion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

3 Responses to “Omni International Hospital Is Once Again Under Fire”

  1. Medical Malpractice Lawyers Perth on June 12th, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    An interesting case, I will be waiting to see how this ends…

  2. grey's anatomy on June 19th, 2009 at 11:10 pm

    I know it can be time-consuming to update the blog but thanks for keeping me informed and entertained!

  3. KonstantinMiller on July 7th, 2009 at 3:48 am

    Hello, can you please post some more information on this topic? I would like to read more.

Leave a Reply

Sponsors

Text Link Ads HighProfits Affiliate Program Affiliate Banner

 

March 2010
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • Anton Sujarwanto: Makasih infonya, sayang saya nggak masuk kriteria.
  • catalog directory: gr8 resrch bro?
  • Reseller Hosting: Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you...
  • Riley: Really great blog here. Thanks! :)
  • Macy: I enjoyed reading your blog.

Others

RSS Sulumits Retsambew Review

  • Statistic update for sulumits retsambew - 27 days left
    Sulumist retsambew's position continues to fluctuate especially the first page of google for keyword sulumits retsambew. Here is the list of sulumits retsambew`s position:#1.http://www.sulumitsretsambew.org/#2.http://www.sulumitsretsambew.org/day-109-of-sulumits-retsambew-contest/#3.http://www.sulumitsretsambewblog.com/#4.http://www.sulumitsretsambewblo […]

Teen drug education also helps curb risky sexual behavior, study finds

School-based drug education programs for adolescents can have a long-term positive impact on sexual behavior in addition to curbing substance abuse, according to a new RAND Corporation study.

Researchers found that young adults who had been exposed to a popular drug abuse prevention program as adolescents were less likely to engage in risky sexual behavior five to seven years later, according to the findings published online by the Journal of Adolescent Health. The study provides the strongest evidence to date that drug abuse prevention programs can also curb risky sexual practices in young adulthood.

“The lessons these young people learned about how to avoid drug and alcohol abuse appears to have had a positive impact on their sexual behavior as well,” said Phyllis Ellickson, the lead author of the study and a researcher at RAND, a nonprofit research organization.

The study found that youth exposed to a drug abuse education program were significantly less likely as young adults to either engage in sex with multiple partners or to have unprotected sex because of drug and alcohol use than their peers who had not received the training.

However, researchers found that those who received drug prevention training were no more likely to use condoms consistently than their peers who did not receive the training.

The RAND Health study tracked the experiences of 1,901 unmarried 21-year-olds who took part in a randomized controlled trial of Project ALERT, a drug use prevention program for middle school students developed by RAND. Study participants were exposed to Project ALERT while they attended middle school in South Dakota.

Among the participants, 631 attended schools that received 14 Project ALERT lessons during middle school, 499 attended schools that received 10 additional lessons during high school and 771 attended schools that did not offer the Project ALERT program.

While risky sexual behavior was common among the study participants, such behavior was less prevalent among those exposed to Project ALERT.

Young adults exposed to Project ALERT were both less likely to have sex with multiple partners (44 percent versus 50 percent) and to have unprotected sex because of drug use (27 percent versus 32 percent) than their peers who had not been exposed to the program.

About 71 percent of study participants reported inconsistent use of condoms, regardless of whether they had been exposed to Project ALERT.

Researchers say that part of the differences between the two groups may be due to the lower use of drugs and alcohol among those exposed to Project ALERT since the behavior is linked to risky sexual practices. But the differences in sexual behavior between the two groups were not entirely explained by the lower substance use levels.

“Although the effects we found are somewhat modest, these findings show that the benefits of drug abuse prevention programs are not confined to drug use alone and can continue for many years after young people receive the instruction,” Ellickson said.

The study found no significant difference in risky sexual behavior between study participants who received the basic Project ALERT lessons in middle school and those who also received extended Project ALERT lessons during ninth and 10th grades.

Ellickson said the study findings are particularly relevant for school officials across the nation who are facing significant budget cuts in the months ahead.

“The findings support the case for the cost-effectiveness of the basic Project ALERT program by showing it provides benefits for two different types of risky behaviors and by showing that those benefits are long lasting,” Ellickson said.
Source: RAND Corporation

Popularity: 1% [?]